Freitag, 19. August 2022

das Haus

das Haus

Am Waldrand
das Haus
ist gebaut
sein Gesicht
schaut
leer in
die Welt

im Museum

im Museum

Speisend
ein Wort Gemisch
aus
einem quirlendem
aufrechtem
stehenden
Bild
im Museum

am Ort

am Ort

Nutzlos
am Ort
von damals
kein Weiterkommen
in einem
zu einem
zurück
in ein Dasein
im hier
und jetzt

Der Wortschrei

Der Wortschrei

Das Gift
im neuen
Kleid

Der Wortschrei
des Betroffenen
wirft sich
ohrenbetäubend
durch den
Blätterwald
durch Straßen
und Gassen

das Gesetz der Massen

das Gesetz der Massen

Flüchtend
in den
Unterstand
naht das
Gesetz
der Massen
in den
letzten
Winkel des
bedürftigen
Daseins

Eine Bleibe

Eine Bleibe

Dem Gesagten
auf Papier 

eine Bleibe
lassen 

in fremder Welt

Das was

sich in der

Bewegung

zeigt


auf wessen

Füssen

der andere

geht und schweigt


da wo die

Nacht 

nach dem

Tag beginnt


dahin 

in fremder

Welt 


will

er seine Schüler 

nicht mehr wissen

anerkennen




Forschungen

Forschungen haben ergeben: Der Mensch ist normalerweise in seiner religiösen Entwicklung im Alter von sieben Jahren stehen geblieben; sonst könnte es ja auch nicht sein, dass ein gebildeter Mensch in Europa normalerweise Christ ist, in Japan dagegen Buddhist und im Orient Moslem.
Die Kirchen nutzen dies aus, indem sie nicht dem Beispiel Jesu folgen, der sich erst als vernünftiger Erwachsener taufen ließ. Nein, sie bemächtigen sich schon der Kinder und indoktrinieren sie, so dass sie dem aufgezwungenen Glauben treu bleiben, mögen sie auch später ein distanziertes Verhältnis zu ihm haben. 
Eigentlich sollte der Staat die Kinder vor solchen Praktiken schützen, aber er würde es nie wagen, sich mit einer so mächtigen Organisation anzulegen. Schließlich ist es ja auch Sache der Eltern, wie sie sich zur Taufe stellen. 

*

Das Wesen
eines Menschen
wird über
die mütterliche Seite
durch die Seele
vererbt
wobei der Mann
zur Weitergabe
des Lebens
nur eine 
Nebenaufgabe hat

Henry Kissinger

“Wir befinden uns am Rande eines Krieges mit Russland und China in Fragen, die wir zum Teil selbst geschaffen haben, ohne eine Vorstellung davon zu haben, wie das Ganze enden wird oder wozu es führen soll”, sagte Kissinger.

*

Wir müssen die unteilbare Menschenwürde verteidigen.

Kirsten Armbruster

Work magically in the Russian crisis
Published on February 23, 2022

Today I'm writing about something I've been doing as a solo witch for many years, but have never written in this form before, namely about magical work in a political context. I am writing this because there is a great concern of war and because I know that many of my readers are witches themselves. Perhaps one or the other will find suggestions to position their power of life against the will of the morbidity of patriarchal men, instead of falling into powerlessness and depression.

In this context, I would like to ask you to connect with the courage of mothers, especially in Russia and Ukraine, because both countries have an ancient, strong tradition of mothers. It is not for nothing that we still speak of Mother Russia today. The matrilineal mother tradition is rooted in the Russian god MOTHER figurines from the Paleolithic, which you can find here on my blog in the text “God MOTHER in the Paleolithic”, which is firmly anchored above, or in my book “Criticism of Patriarchy”, it goes beyond the numerous God MOTHER figurines in the Neolithic, many of which, especially from the Cucuteni culture, are in the Musum in Kyiv in the Ukraine and which I have also included in the gallery of God MOTHER figurines in my book Criticism of the Patriarchate and it is still visible everywhere in the widespread Matryoshka figurines who have captured the ingrained knowledge of matrilineal descent. All this is a long-rooted maternal knowledge, a maternal power component deeply rooted in nature that we can activate.

Which has been interwoven with magical work for a long time can of course also go further and draw protective circles around countries and places or continue to work with bindings and bans with regard to the male patriarchal forces in Russia as a whole and especially in politics. Especially the latter I do not recommend to those who have never worked with magic before, as there own protective circle mechanisms should be observed. I always put myself and my family and my environment first and foremost under the protection of the divine mother anchored in the Palaeolithic, whom I call God MOTHER, but who you also know as the Great Goddess, from the splitting up into many goddesses. In this context, of course, you can also summon the elements and all mother forces that are deeply anchored in nature.

With regard to the protection circles, I would like to expressly point out that this does not only apply to the Ukraine, but also to other neighboring countries, but especially to Germany, with the focus on Berlin. I would like to remind you that the collapse of the Soviet Union, deeply regretted by Putin in his last speech, is closely related to the reunification of Germany during the Gorbachev administration.

Putin is a man who is deeply patriarchal in the KGB, who, as was clearly evident in his speech a few days ago, has fantasized about a deeply revisionist understanding of history, anchored in totalitarian Stalinism, that shrinks from nothing, I guess not even from one nuclear attack. As I wrote yesterday, I have the impression that Putin has nothing left to lose, perhaps also because he may actually be ill, which I think is quite possible based on his posture and movements. However: such men are dangerous in their unscrupulousness!

I would like to point out another possibility of magical work and I would like to draw your attention to China. China's Foreign Minister, Wang Yi, also spoke at the Munich Security Conference last weekend. In his speech, he sent clear signals against NATO, but also signaled that he absolutely recognizes Ukraine as a separate state, which Putin denied historically in his last speech. China has close economic ties with Ukraine, so China may well show less solidarity with Putin than he would like. So one can also try to have a magical effect in this regard.

Take what I wrote as suggestions. If you don't understand this post at all, just forget it.

May these words be understood correctly!

Kirsten Armbruster

The Ukraine War – a Crusade of Russian Orthodoxy?
Released April 8, 2022

The so-called Sun Temple on the island of Crimea, a rock circle landscape in the Ilyas Kaya; Photo: Elena Stadler on the website http://www.naturwissen.com based on Boris Bojtschenko free for private use
The Ukraine war, which is so preoccupying us these days, actually began in 2014 with the Russian occupation of Crimea. And, in order to better understand the current war, it is worth taking a closer look at Putin's view of the Crimean peninsula in the Black Sea.

From the IPKF, the interdisciplinary research on the criticism of patriarchy, we know that the close connection between politics and theology in connection with the means of war is the main pillar of patriarchy. Of theology, mind you, not of religion in the original sense of a maternal image of God that is anchored in the natural cycle of life and death, but of theologies that are always based on a male image of God and on a monopoly of dying on the use of military force, dictated by a ruler and completely detached from the circle of the living. But where is the theological aspect of today's war? Let's take a closer look at Crimea.

In terms of landscape mythology, the Crimea has preserved the former sanctity of the landscape, among other things in a rock circle, the sanctity of Mother Earth, Mrs. Moon and Mrs. Sun, the original religion of the cosmic divine mother, which we in Europe from the westernmost regions of Spain and France have freed themselves from the patriarchal transformations up to the eastern Siberian regions of Europe. (Armbruster, Kirsten: Criticism of Patriarchy, 2021 see God MOTHER figurines in the Paleolithic and in the Neolithic pp. 436-518). And just as we in Western Europe can clear away the Christian superimpositions of the original religion, especially on the widely ramified Jacobsweg, there with a Catholic character (see: Armbruster, Kirsten: Der Jacobsweg und der Muschelweg, 2013 and 2014), so we find these Christian ones Overlays also on the island of Crimea, here in the guise of the Russian-Orthodox orientation

In 2016, the Neue Züricher Zeitung wrote about Russia’s claim to Crimea under the headline: “Crimea is stylized as “holy ground””:

"In order to support Russia's claim to power in Crimea, loyalist 'historians' do not shy away from wild historical speculations. The aim is to rewrite the occidental chronology" (NZZ, Ingold, Felix, Philipp: 30.11.2016)

Reference is made, among other things, to a shrine in the Uspenski rock monastery on the Crimean peninsula, where the Virgin Mary is said to have lived in the 12th century.


rock caves of the Uspensky Monastery; CCBY-SA3.0; GNU Free License
In a keynote speech on the state of the nation, Putin justifies the annexation of Crimea by saying:

"that the peninsula in the Black Sea is as sacred to Russia as the Temple Mount is to those who profess Judaism or Islam". (NZZ, 2016, ibid.).

Russia's theological claim to Crimea is based on the research of mathematician Anatoly Formenko, who has gathered hundreds of computer scientists, historians, linguists, geologists and archaeologists in his own institute at Lomonosov University in Moscow. The Süddeutsche Zeitung writes:

"What you want to prove, using the latest methods and ancient myths, is nothing other than that a thousand years of world history were not simply falsified as part of the greatest fraud of all time, but simply invented. Jesus was actually born in Crimea in 1053, which is also where the Bible is set, before being moved to Judea and Galilee. It was in the Crimea that not only Christianity was invented, but the Occident itself, and world civilization was initiated by Russian culture. It is only in the light of this knowledge that one really understands why Russia wanted the Crimea, from which everything started, so badly". (Gauß, Karl-Markus: Jesus ate goulash at the last supper, Süddeutsche Zeitung, May 2, 2019).

Adds Ms. that in October 2018 the Russian Orthodox Church separated from the Orthodox Patriarch of Istanbul (Constantinople) because the latter had supported the establishment of a separate Orthodox Church of Ukarine, which is a de facto split in the Orthodox Church, It becomes clear that today's Ukraine war has an essential theological component, which gives the war, like all Crusades, a fanatical component that has so far been completely ignored in the political discussion, but which intensifies the danger of this war.

The geopolitical and geographical axis to Serbia, with the Putin-friendly Hungary as a buffer state, also comes into focus, because in Serbia we also find the orthodox form of the CChristianity. Should this too – after the Ukraine – be reintegrated into Russian orthodoxy, back home into the Great Russian Empire of today's Tsar Putin? And are we mentally prepared for the political assessment of the Ukraine war for its theological-fanatical component in the form of a large-scale orthodox crusade. I'm afraid not. But I think it makes sense to keep an eye on this theological aspect of power, because ideologically the most bitter and unscrupulous battles are fought in the name of a male god, because the reward then awaits in heaven, not on earth.

Kirsten Armbruster


Released May 17, 2022


After I've been written to again and again asking me to take a stand on the subject of trans, I've decided to respond to this again in short form at this point. I would like to point out, however, that in 2021 I made a differentiated analysis in my book "Criticism of Patriarchy" (pp. 563-604) in a separate 40-page chapter entitled "Homosexuality, intersexuality, transsexuality and transhuman transgenderism Perspective of Interdisciplinary Research on Criticism of Patriarchy (IPKF)” dealt with the topic. So here are a few conclusions in brief:


Basically, I think it is wrong to speak of transsexuality. On the other hand, I prefer the term transgender because trans is not about sexuality, but about the understanding of gender, which is something completely different.


The results of the interdisciplinary patriarchy criticism research IPKF made me think in terms of nature and biology. In doing so, I revealed that our current thinking about the male-female pair order is completely wrong, not only because it is caught in the heteronormative concept of sexuality for mammalian species, i.e. all mammals including the human species, but also on the reproductive level not true. Our societal coding of 50% father + 50% mother = child, with the father named first, is biologically completely wrong and is based on the patriarchal brainwashing that we are all subjected to. I have written two chapters on this in my book "Criticism of Patriarchy", the chapter "Of maternal biological facts and the patriarchal dogma of male "seed" that degrades mothers to passive vessels of men" (p.38-51) and the chapter " Male fertility delusion as the basis of patriarchy” (pp. 114-153). The first chapter can also be read using the search function in this blog.


The result of the IPKF in a nutshell: In all mammalian species, the focus of biology is not on the female-male pair order, but on the mother and in the case of menopausal species, to which humans even belong in an outstanding way, the mother-grandmother line is also particularly important for the survival of the species elementary. I have also written a separate chapter on this in my book “Criticism of Patriarchy”, namely “Grandmothers and mothers as carriers of human evolution” (pp. 293-304). I coined the term "Natural Integrative Order of the Mother (NIOM)". The man is part of this NIOM order, because in the course of evolution nature has arranged it in such a way that the male does not give birth to the male and the woman does not give birth to the female, but that the mother gives birth to all life. The fact that we are caught up in couple thinking today is therefore not natural or biological, but the result of male hubris normalization enforced by force, the core of the patriarchally told story of the “victors”. And how brainwashing works, we can understand very well today in the Putin twists that make you doubt common sense.


On the other hand, when one begins to think of the mother as the beginning of all human life, we can see that the biological order of man is not the couple, but matrifocality, and that the man, as a biological father, is an important but, in relation to the mother, a very important one contributes little to reproduction. (more on that in my book Criticism of Patriarchy). Matrifocality here means quite simply: mothers in focus, mothers in the centre. It is the logical biological order of man and has nothing to do with matriarchy.


If we approach the topic of transgender under this premise, we see that the two "warring parties" in the public discussion, which is carried out with heavy bandages in particular on Twitter, that on the one hand the TRAs, the so-called trans activists and on the other side the Radfems, the so-called radical feminists, basically both use the non-human species-appropriate pair order as a basis for thinking. The Tra's insist on being recognized as male or female, even though their secondary sex characteristics are assigned to the opposite sex, and the Radfems insist that there are only 2 sexes. They derive gender from the external sex organs and chromosomally, i.e. from the X and Y chromosomes. I think both are wrong, because the male-female standardization is the typical patriarchal couple standardization, while the mother standardization is made invisible and suppressed in patriarchy.


The solution to the problem that cannot be solved within the patriarchal pair order lies there n no longer to think in terms of the couple, but to think in terms of the mother, because sexual development begins in the mother's body. In my book "Criticism of Patriarchy" I therefore pointed out in the sub-chapter Transgender (p. 586-598) that the embryo cannot be thought of separately from the mother's body with all the complicated biochemical interactions in the course of pregnancy that we are talking about to this day hardly understand anything. In this context, I have suggested using a four-factor model as a basis for better understanding as a model for sex development, according to which the biological sex in humans is not only derived from the genetic sex, which is derived from the sex chromosomes X and Y, from the gonadal sex, which is derived from the ovaries and testicles, from the phenotypic sex, which is derived from the internal and external sex organs, but also from another sex-determining factor, namely what I call brain sex. This is based on the findings that, from a neuroscientific point of view, it is known that sex hormones are jointly responsible for gender-specific dimorphisms in brain development and the formation of gender-typical behaviors. With the embryo, however, we are not only dealing with these relevant influencing factors of the embryo body, but also with other highly complex possible interactions on the part of the mother's body. Since we all now know that research is still primarily male-dominated, it is immediately understandable that we are still groping in the dark when it comes to mother-body research.


I now assume that transgenderness is a biological fact, even if – as is also the case with homosexuality and heterosexuality – we have so far lacked measurable physiological parameters. I assume that trans men and trans women are expressions of biological gender diversity within the maternal order NIOM, which is always inclusive. I think that our erroneous couple norms, owed to patriarchy, are to blame for people feeling like they were born in the wrong body. I have serious doubts that surgeries and/or maybe even hormone treatments are really necessary for a good life, provided we don't live in a patriarchal, heteronormative world, with gender ideas that are completely cross-patriarchal at that.


Summary:


I consider the current discussion on the highly complex issue of transgenderness to be unproductive and not solution-oriented, and I consider Twitter in particular, with its emotionally toxic algorithms, to be completely counterproductive. It is right and important to give transgender space in society. Since I personally, as has often been explained, consider psychology to be deeply standardized by patriarchy and, as with homosexuality, there are no clearly measurable biological parameters, since we have so far had very little biological understanding of the subject, I support the planned self-ID law to give those affected social space for the only viable political path at the moment, just as homosexuals or bisexuals should be able to know and live their sexual preferences in a self-determined manner, which is by no means the case everywhere.


Trans people must and should be visible in our society and should hold political offices. I therefore consider the argumentation of the Radfems to be wrong, because they deny the existence of transgenderity with their insistence on only two biological sexes, which of course is part of the aggression spiral bubble in which this discussion has been moving so far. But I also think that the idea of ​​a Judith Butler that gender is not biological but only socially based and that transhuman transgenderism developed on this basis is downright absurd. Just as nature is the basis of life as a whole, biology is always the basis of human life. Therefore, it makes no sense to yell from the side of the TRA's: trans women are women and in the course of occupying women's spaces with violence. No they are not: women are women, trans women are trans women, men are men and trans men are trans men.


Diversity, and in this case gender diversity, is nature's way. And, since we unfortunately still live in the midst of patriarchy, the legitimate fears of the Radfems that are there must be taken into account when dealing with the topic of transgender: There must be spaces that are purely women and also spaces that are purely women's shelters, for example in sports, for example in prisons , for example in women's shelters, for example in connection with the exercise of free female sexual choice, especially among lesbians. And it must be growing in youth and

Kirsten Armbruster

Solidarity with Ukraine and now?
Published on February 25, 2022

Now Putin, the new iron dictator of Russia, has carried out the threat of rape he issued to Kyiv during Macron's visit on February 7, 2022 - which he called "the beautiful one who has to submit". As a trained critic of patriarchy, all the alarm bells went off for me at the press conference at the press conference, and even went red in connection with his malicious grin. Does she still have a chance, the beautiful woman who aroused the desire of a totalitarian ruler, or the world will see go ahead with this act of rape? Terrified, but paralyzed and ultimately inactive?

And what about China and Xi Jinping? China has now come to the formulation that there would be no invasion of Ukraine. Here, too, all alarm bells should go off, because this formulation means nothing other than that the axis of the totalitarian regimes stands together, supplemented by Iran, which yesterday also professed true brotherhood with the steely, phallus-driven Putin. Men's unions close together again. For everyone familiar with the IPKF's interdisciplinary research on the criticism of patriarchy, another warning sign, also for red. This fascinating red, the color of blood over which men - unlike women - only have power if they hurt and kill: war red.

How dare China claim that there is no invasion of Ukraine when everyone can see that the opposite is true. In fact, this is quite easy to understand when one consults Putin's one-hour imperialist rage foam speech of February 23, 2022 for clarification. In this, Putin denies Ukraine's own territoriality, because it has no tradition of statehood. In patriarchal logos thinking, this means that there can be no invasion if I move in an area that already belongs to me anyway under the now resurrected Soviet law. So if China now claims that the Russian incursion into Ukraine is not an invasion at all, we should be very careful. It seems to me that two brothers are playing a set game in a totalitarian, patriarchal spirit: You, Brother Xi, tolerate my invasion plans towards Ukraine, and I, Brother Putin the Steel, support you argumentatively if you should feel like annexing Taiwan. The Winter Olympics, in Beijing, China, was a good place and a good time to make such a plan, because the four Taiwanese athletes* were not allowed to appear there under the name Taiwan, let alone show a flag or sing their national anthem at the Listen to two bronze medals being awarded. No, because they had to compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" or not at all. The German stirrup age of the IOC Thomas Bach, also a brother in the spirit of patriarchy, keeps quiet there too – smiling away at everything.

So if China were to invade Taiwan in the near future, that wouldn't be an invasion either, because in the logic of Ukraine, China would only be taking back what already belonged to it in the sense of patriarchal power hegemony.

And the world? It then looks pretty stupid, because, as Bernd Ziesemer wrote in Capital on October 18, 2021, “probably the most important company in the world” is based in Taiwan, the company TSMC, world market leader in the field of semiconductors, the most important building block of digitization. Bad for the democratic part of the world!

Does it look fine? no The patriarchy is rearing up dangerously once again in terms of male ties. Does this make me lose my courage? No, because nature is stronger than any patriarchy. But it would be good if more people understood the structures of patriarchy better in depth. Then we could act proactively instead of reactively.

Gehorsam leisten

Mein kleines ich
zwischen der Aussenwelt
und der Innenwelt
muss in der Verstrickung
zur Aussenwelt
und der Mutter
die die Seele ist
ihr Gehorsam leisten

ohne Gesicht

Nah umfasst

durch Zähne

einer nackten

Haut

ein schlaffer

Leib ohne

Gesicht in

Daunenkissen




aufmerksam

Wacht im Gebet

*

ich höre der
Seele
was sie mir
im Traum
zu sagen hat
aufmerksam zu

Karl Barth

Karl Barth über das Gebet (Kirchliche Dogmatik III/4, 1951): „Gebet ist die nur Gott zugewendete und insofern strikt die innere Seite des Lobes Gottes. Gebet als Glaubensdemonstration, Gebet als verkleidete Predigt, Gebet als Instrument der Erbauung ist ein heller Unfug, ist kein Gebet. Gebet ist kein Gebet, wenn man dabei einem Anderen als Gott etwas sagen will.“

*

Ich kann keinem Gott etwas sagen
in Demut das eigene Dasein ertragen
tagtäglich der Versuch
den Grundsatz der unteilbaren
Würde für alle Menschen bezeugen

mit wem

Und Gott*? – Geht mit!
mit wem
und welchem nicht?

Zarentagen

Zitat:

Charle Helen

Dem Menschen ist seine Freiheit das Wichtigste und rechtfertigte Kriege schon immer damit, dass die Freiheit damit gewonnen wurde (wurde sie jemals dadurch gewonnen?) So kämpft jetzt auch Selenskyj wie ein Irrer für die Ukraine – lieber Tod in einem zerstörten Land, als unter Putin leben. Ich nenne ihn einen Irren, denn es ist irrsinnig gegen Putin kämpfen zu wollen ohne die ganze Welt in einen Krieg mit hineinzuziehen und das hat er bereits erreicht, durch die Zerstörung des Hafens von dem so viele Länder von Weizenlieferungen lebensnotwendig abhängig sind, neben dem Unfrieden, einem regelrechten Krieg wegen des russische Gases, was Inflation und Angst auslöst. Merkel hat in gutem Vertrauen den Vertrag mit Putin unterzeichnet, Merkel hat nicht versagt, sondern das Vertrauen wurde gebrochen durch Putins Gier nach einer Macht aus vergangenen Zarentagen heraus.

*

Wir müssen die unteilbare Menschenwürde verteidigen.

Die Unruhe



Wenn Gott unser Gott ist, dann gibt Er uns Frieden inmitten von Unruhe. 


"Wahren Frieden und haben"


*


Die Unruhe bleibt

damit wir nicht hochmütig werden

darum herum

Leben wir in einem Schwarzen Loch?


*


So viel ich weiss dreht sich die Muttergalaxie darum herum.

Schweiz

„Keine halben Sachen im Schweizer Nationalpark! Saniert endlich den Spöl!“

überlang

Die weisse

Limusine

wird im 

Rückwärtsgang

in der Kehre

hinauf


im abschüssigen

Gelände

auf dem

Bergweg

überlang







The big soul

The big soul

In fortified
room
wooden
are the
People
fled

 

The big soul
is still
warm
an image
of the house of God
should despite
the robbery
the hordes
her firm
Seat in the
Preserve village
the fugitives
does not stay
choice

Большая душа

Большая душа

В укрепленных
комната
из дерева
являются
люди
бежал

Большая душа
по-прежнему
тепло
изображение
дома Божия
должен, несмотря на
ограбление
орды
ее фирмы
Место в
Сохранять деревню
беглецы
не остается
выборы

Coat of arms

Coat of arms

At the
crossroads
in the
stranger
want a
single
internally
after and
after two
various
Countries completely
to conquer alone
he can
themselves
in the street
do not decide
through which
City gate thoughtfully
different
Coat of arms he
to tread
should

十字路口

十字路口


十字路口

陌生人
想要一個

國內
之後和
兩次後
幾個
國家完全
單獨征服
他可以
他自己
在街上
不要決定
通過它
城門精心打理
不同
他的徽章

Become

Become

The hand
on the
Bed the
there lays
will be first
to nothing
cold
become

Uit koue sal

Uit koue sal

Die hand
op die
Bed die
daar lê
sal eerste wees
tot niks
uit koue
sal

das Schwert

Ich bin nicht gekommen
Euch den Frieden zu geben
sondern das Schwert
hat jener 
einmal gesagt

wer seine eigenen
Schattenseiten nicht
anerkennen konnte
und alles dem
Zweifler anhängt hat

die Gesetze
der Seele
sind so alt
wie die Menschheit selbst 

wir müssen
die unteilbare
Menschenwürde
verteidigen

Das Weib

Das Weib
sei dem Manne
untertan
so gesagt
in der Christenlehre
alle Menschen
sind der
unteilbaren
Menschenwürde